Comments on: GC on Sweeping Strikes and Bladestorm http://www.wow-track.com/2009/12/19/gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm World of Warcraft news Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:52:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Glenn http://www.wow-track.com/2009/12/19/gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-1800 Glenn Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:45:17 +0000 http://www.wow-track.com/?p=1632#comment-1800 I play a holy pally and rogue in pvp , i dont want to qq or something ,my rogue and my arena partner(resto druid) always lose against warriors cuz when i go toe to toe i go down like im 20lvls lower or something i dont know much about warriors but bladestorm is pretty insane ,on my pally however i can survive for quite a while so i think you should just face your class has a disadvantage against some classes I play a holy pally and rogue in pvp , i dont want to qq or something ,my rogue and my arena partner(resto druid) always lose against warriors cuz when i go toe to toe i go down like im 20lvls lower or something i dont know much about warriors but bladestorm is pretty insane ,on my pally however i can survive for quite a while so i think you should just face your class has a disadvantage against some classes

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

]]> By: David http://www.wow-track.com/2009/12/19/gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-1662 David Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:18:50 +0000 http://www.wow-track.com/?p=1632#comment-1662 Bladestorm is one of the few things we can do to level the playing field against other people in pvp. As it stands our DPS is usually fairly sad compared to other jobs and now there are other jobs that can tank more capably than Warriors can. Warrior religiously gets the short end of the stick on updates. Keep nerfing the job and people are just going to stop playing it. Bladestorm is one of the few things we can do to level the playing field against other people in pvp. As it stands our DPS is usually fairly sad compared to other jobs and now there are other jobs that can tank more capably than Warriors can. Warrior religiously gets the short end of the stick on updates. Keep nerfing the job and people are just going to stop playing it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Terry http://www.wow-track.com/2009/12/19/gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-1650 Terry Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:47:04 +0000 http://www.wow-track.com/?p=1632#comment-1650 First off, this is a game and is intended to be enjoyed. Now, having a warrior tank as my first and highest level character, I think that playing a warrior has to be one of the most difficult and challenging characters to play. As a tank, you have to try and keep aggro when there are ppl doing 5k+ DPS, and as a DPS role you have to try and stay above 2k+ DPS or you suck. Tanks should be one of the most feared characters to PvP because of their damage mitigation and high health. Instead, they are nothing more than a dummy to beat on (just takes longer because of these attributes). As a DPS in PvP they are unable to hold a candle to others (hunter, mage, etc.). So why even play one do you ask? Because when you can PvP with your warrior and still compete with others, while the whole time being the main focus of raids and heroics, it says a lot about your ability to play the game and create epic characters. Don't get me wrong, I wish there were more AoE skills for keeping aggro but we do with what we got. I hope this makes the rest of the warrior world feel better about themselves. It takes a special person to play a warrior.

First off, this is a game and is intended to be enjoyed. Now, having a warrior tank as my first and highest level character, I think that playing a warrior has to be one of the most difficult and challenging characters to play. As a tank, you have to try and keep aggro when there are ppl doing 5k+ DPS, and as a DPS role you have to try and stay above 2k+ DPS or you suck. Tanks should be one of the most feared characters to PvP because of their damage mitigation and high health. Instead, they are nothing more than a dummy to beat on (just takes longer because of these attributes). As a DPS in PvP they are unable to hold a candle to others (hunter, mage, etc.). So why even play one do you ask? Because when you can PvP with your warrior and still compete with others, while the whole time being the main focus of raids and heroics, it says a lot about your ability to play the game and create epic characters. Don’t get me wrong, I wish there were more AoE skills for keeping aggro but we do with what we got. I hope this makes the rest of the warrior world feel better about themselves. It takes a special person to play a warrior.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

]]> By: Jeff Hine http://www.wow-track.com/2009/12/19/gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-1641 Jeff Hine Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:53:14 +0000 http://www.wow-track.com/?p=1632#comment-1641 If you ask me, Blizzard would be perfectly happy to have all PvE Warriors as Tanks and not DPS. Warriors seem to be one of the Classic Classes that is so inflexible that they are pretty much only intended to serve as one role. I can even see them (Blizzard) moving towards disabling/removing the ability for Warrior to dual-wield, except with Titan's Grip... even have Warriors be the first ever Class to be removed from the game. I blame the Death Knight inception for the demise of the Warrior; who realistically goes out of their way to roll a DPS Warrior, these days, when a mana-using Class will always out DPS a Warrior to get to L55, then you can roll a Death Knight is you 'really' want a Plate DPS Class...? Yes; I have Warrior as a main; have had for close on 2 years, and have only ever DPS'd -- if Tanking was made a 'bigger deal' of, then I might know about the skill of Tanking & may be able to more readily adapt to the role - as it isn't, well...

If you ask me, Blizzard would be perfectly happy to have all PvE Warriors as Tanks and not DPS.

Warriors seem to be one of the Classic Classes that is so inflexible that they are pretty much only intended to serve as one role.

I can even see them (Blizzard) moving towards disabling/removing the ability for Warrior to dual-wield, except with Titan’s Grip… even have Warriors be the first ever Class to be removed from the game.

I blame the Death Knight inception for the demise of the Warrior; who realistically goes out of their way to roll a DPS Warrior, these days, when a mana-using Class will always out DPS a Warrior to get to L55, then you can roll a Death Knight is you ‘really’ want a Plate DPS Class…?

Yes; I have Warrior as a main; have had for close on 2 years, and have only ever DPS’d — if Tanking was made a ‘bigger deal’ of, then I might know about the skill of Tanking & may be able to more readily adapt to the role – as it isn’t, well…

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 10

]]> By: kenneth http://www.wow-track.com/2009/12/19/gc-on-sweeping-strikes-and-bladestorm/comment-page-1/#comment-1631 kenneth Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:52:13 +0000 http://www.wow-track.com/?p=1632#comment-1631 i think its dumb that blizzered has its pally babys and its over powered mages and for heaven sakes a dk can tank better than us and they dont even have a shild and now that blizz messed up yet it points on a warriors behalf everyones like cry cry cry cuz they have never been killed by a warrior well i think its bull and i also think its a warriors time to shine i mean i dont want to never die cuz then the game would be no fun but i want clotheys to run it fear when the frezz me and i just keep coming but now thats a bad thing although its ok to stun beat beat stun heal heal beat beat bubble and the hearth i think blizz has there babys and they are just tired of seeing them die so i guess warriors will go back down to the bottom of the dps bars again.... but some one do me a fav. and tell me when its my turn to be on top again tell me when its my turn to shine... love kennie from Hydraxis Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 11

]]>